It was at that point that I, in the interest of not being any more offended than I already was (and I'm not even Catholic), stopped reading! Why Sweetie felt the need to read the entire thing and then express here how much it offended her is beyond me. Of course, I came as soon as I heard what's been going on.Īs a lifelong Christian, and a writer of vulvacentric historical fiction, I never thought for a moment that I would ever get the opportunity to stand so close to the eye-poppingly cavernous opening of Jesus' mom's moist, clammy ladyhole!
#UNDERPASS VIRGIN MARY PATCH#
MRS CHENEY: Chicagoans, I am so moved to stand on this sacred patch of dank and sooty roadway with you today. I'd suspect that your entire library is nothing but Chick tractates.It's about the reading level I'd expect for you. They show that same petty moralist attitude as you do.
I happen to think Chick tractates are funny, too. Did I say I was specifically offended or did I imply that it makes one look like a sick pig to be associated with it in the same way that it makes Fundamentalists look like ignorant fools to post Chick tracts? Didn't I say it was idiotic, ie: a tad too distasteful and idiotic to have any value? Being offended by the article would be the equivalent of being offended by a Chick which would assume value and substance, both of which I've denied that this article has. Even funnier now, knowing that a brainless, humorless, poker-up-the-ass petty moralist like you is offended. It made explicit what several other posters had already said in so many words, but you were probably so dense, ignorant and down-right Down's Syndrome stupid about it, that it took the graphic representation for you to take offense. You are not the boss of me, or anyone else here, so you can sit on it and spin, fuckwad. You need to get over thinking that you are the arbiter of what class and tact is on this board.or anywhere for that matter. You just didn't like it, so you are now trying to make it difficult, uncomfortable, and problematic to post anything here that might offend your precious little moralistic sensibilities. But it was germane to the discussion and to the point. By attempting to paint anyone associated with the page I posted as being classless, tasteless, crass, or whatever, you are attempting to force your standards on everyone else here. In my opinion, you should not have posted what you did, I'm not censoring you, I'm questioning your tact and class.īut you're trying, none the less. I don't have the power to censor first of all, I offer my opinion (or my freethought if you will), I'll defend it, you may agree or disagree. I henceforth will treat your posts as they deserve. I must truly be a terrible human being, how dare I comment?
Like I said, I would rather be the idiotic moralist than one who posts and finds value in such things.ĭon't forget, now I'm the idiotic "shitty" moralist. If me being a moralist means that I am not sick nor whatever else, if that is what it means to be a moralist then I am pleased to be one. If my being a "moralist" means that I have strong opinions, I have reason for those opinions, I'm not afraid to speak them or defend them, they disagree with yours, I like and can defend them unapologetically, etc. However, if you consider that article funny and I am to place any value on your definition and opinion as far as me being a "moralist" is concerned, you need to think again. Look man, I can and will defend myself so you must understand, I am not complaining or whining, I think I stand in a position of strength because the article really is that bad. Get used to it, you shitty little moralist censor.
0 kommentar(er)
